![]() |
|
Objectives After completing this module, you will be able to:
Assigned Readings -- Read
These DeVaus, Ch. 4, 5 & 6; Please note that the designs described on page 59, paragraphs 3 and 4 (starting with Another form of natural experiment...) and the retrospective design described on pages 60-61 are not true experiments. They are quasi-experiments. We will discuss them next week. Krause, M.S. & Howard K.I. (2003) What random assignment does and does not do. Journal of Clinical Psychology 59(7), 751-766. Assigned Readings -- Read ONE of These Haslum, M.N. (2007) What kind of evidence do we need for evaluating therapeutic interventions? Dyslexia 13, 234-239. Henry, G.T. (2009). When getting it right matters: The case for high-quality policy and program impact evaluation. In S.I. Donaldson, C.A. Christina & M.M. Mark (eds.), What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice?, pp. 31-50, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. e-reserve Recommended Readings Greeno, C.G. (2001) The skeleton: What underlies treatment research? Family Process 40(3), 361-363. Greeno, C.G. (2001) The classical experimental design. Family Process 40(4), 495-499. Rumrill, P.D., Jr. & Bellini,
J.L. (1999) The logic of experimental design. J. Vocational Rehabilitation.
13, 65-70. Learning
Guide: True Experiments Advance Preparation |